The Supreme Court of Canada in the federal lawsuit against the tobacco companies responsible for the damages and drawn on a Friday ruling could not.
There was a unanimous decision where the tobacco industry off the hook for potentially billions of dollars if you lose if you are going to win for Ottawa in either case, once.
Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., and various other major tobacco companies to the Federal Government was trying to have the third Supreme Court declared the party. He would force the role Genetics: Ottawa
Friday's decision in the Court of appeal of British Columbia and two appeals on the cover and all tobacco companies rejected the arguments put forward by in both cases.
Imperial Tobacco said it was "disappointing" decision.
"Unfortunately, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions and actions of the Federal Government has decided it is not responsible for the" Donald McCarty, Vice President of Imperial Tobacco Canada said of the law. "We want to set the record straight, though, and it is the answer to a long and continued participation in the tobacco industry for the Government of Canada is important."
Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq was pleased Friday afternoon, the Government said claims for the tobacco company Canada taxpayer support for the statement of will. Thanks to the smoking of tobacco control in Canada Aglukkaq to reduce government initiatives of various world leaders, he said.
Imperial Tobacco smokers smoke so-called light and mild brands to buy and people who want their money back at facing class action lawsuit. They argued that the level of tar and nicotine cigarettes are listed in the package of the Empire, the actual did not reflect the toxic emissions from harmful tobacco smoke produced from them as just a plain.
In other cases related to smoking-related illness, British Columbia tobacco companies to pay for medical expenses. Provincial legislation, the cost of health care costs Recovery Act tobacco companies so it can be to held accountable for. Bc Government in 1950, was known by the company they are hazardous to your health or tobacco health risk to the public of their products are known for their claims from the alert failed.
If you start 13 years ago, and since other provinces in legal wrangling followed a lead to BC. All 10 provinces is similar to the other three now costs Recovery Act, a bill passed (in Ontario, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador) initiated the court proceedings, and Nova Scotia, Quebec, Manitoba, Alberta they were intended to take legal action against tobacco companies. Ontario can only in case the amount of $ 5 billion.
Imperial tobacco, and other companies (Ross, Inc., Philip Morris International, Benson amp; hedges and other inclusive), the Federal Government should be based on several third-party.
They claim the Government of the low-tar cigarettes as consumers and wires, another cigarette tobacco companies in a number of less hazardous duty was neglected. In addition, the Government sanctioned the Government of negligence and mismanagement, low tar cigarettes the tobacco company for a Variant.
"The Federal Government for decades has been known about the risk associated with smoking and they instigated the development and sale of light and mild ' products in Canada ' promotion," McCarty said in a statement Friday. "It's amazing the number of steps away from Canada, the Government's responsibility and tobacco production, manufacturing and marketing of tobacco products for decades and fully in all aspects of these allegations, leaving when full hostility of the tune," he said.
If the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Friday against tobacco companies, the Federal Government may not consume. (Adrian W l y d/Canada press release)Supreme Court justices had a "duty of insurance", but in some cases, the Federal Government agreed to Ottawa was acting in good faith and to switch to less tar and cigarette smoke, Government policy encouraging people to continue with the following.
The policy has developed in Canada's health concerns, therefore, court decisions in the legal action.
Tobacco companies are still the Federal Government that they have to control the production of evidence, and regardless of Ottawa, including court rules wanted to be a part of the litigation is bound by so financially, it was not responsible if you decide to declare in favour of the Supreme Court in a third party.
In addition, the Federal Government to mount a defense if it is not the third tobacco company refused a request to the Supreme Court, saying it would be a dysfunction.
Health and private spaces non-smoking advocates were satisfied with the tobacco industry to deliver a blow.
"The tobacco industry to defeat at the hands of the Supreme Court received today a very important," said Rob Cunningham, represents Canada Cancer Society. "The tobacco industry for many years there was an epidemic of tobacco through their unjust actions and it will be required to pay the damage tobacco industy."
He accused the tobacco industry was trying to move and it is to block a lawsuit against others with a legal challenge after another.
Cynthia Callard, Executive Director of physicians for a smoke-free Canada, said the Federal Government to draw on their own corporate attempts in the last major card play, and they lost was viewed.
"I have a very good day for the Federal Government and has been a very bad thing for the tobacco company. But it is yet to be seen whether that is a good day for the public, "she said.
The Federal Government would have been lost, it is actually a tobacco company for it, she said, they would then fight the Federal Government for the province because they are not their intent more difficult.
She relieved off the hook in such a case, she said in Ottawa. "The importance of getting the Federal Government, the main .... You can start the real litigation efforts, "she said.
However, if the province against the tobacco company Callard, and worry about, they are more open and they want to achieve a legal action for the need to be transparent. If it's just not good enough, he can get money, Callard and Cunningham.
"The actions of the tobacco industry in the future and the past does not repeat what has happened in so we need some health reform," Cunningham said.
Back to the Accessibility link
没有评论:
发表评论