2011年7月29日星期五

Judge Tosses Ecstasy case BC, for rights violations

5 men accused of running a multi-million dollar Ecstasy laboratory in Richmond trial court district judges were repeated violations of the Charter of rights, saying there was because of the throw.

January 2007 almost 100 kilograms of ecstasy, the Mounties were discovered during the year nine pills at home to carry out an investigation, the two Richmond presses.

Hu Qing Shao-Wei Huang, Yi, Rick Hou, Feng Zhou Kai Lai, Kevin Lee and Kayla and all produce for the purpose of trafficking Ecstasy Ecstasy was charged with possession.

But the judge, District Court Judge Paul Myers 30 pages of RCMP charged issue of dealt with the incident, and vitriol.

"Who was responsible for a lot of people blame police in this investigation started is complete, one can also think of the Charter of rights before rights enacted in violation of the Charter, the survey took place, so" Meyer wrote.

He said the defendants of their rights for their arrest or to explain the reason for the interpreter is to not bother sorting for mentioning, knowing about the police and they probably wouldn't understand or speak English very well.

Meyers, the two accused to the Court House warrants not blow it in the registry, the execution of a warrant showing Richmond law within 7 days as needed by police have failed to report.

An attempt was made to clean the potentially volatile substances, Myers said of the accused, their neighbor's view, while half-naked in the middle of winter, police hosed down the suspects.

"All the officers in charge of the case amount cumulatively, in my view, these were guaranteed by virtue of the Canada law co-accuseds which completely unconcerned with the Charter of rights and the conclusion is inevitable," Myers said. "Didn't seem to care about who is responsible for the officers of the just."

Meyer, "bad faith" every step of the way the accused officers in charge of the investigation.

"In this case, the decision was a violation of the Charter of rights for each of the defendants," Myers wrote.

While there are strong vested interest in the prosecution admitted that the distribution of illegal substances, blamed "a vested interest in making sure society is also very strong and we're not running the police proudly enshrined in our Charter of rights and freedoms through its valued rights law," said Meyers.

"The reputation of the administration of Justice in the long term, will degrade the defendants [NULL] seized by the police with evidence to admit that."

Myers dismissed the evidence seized during a RAID in January 2007, all of them to police.

Back to the Accessibility link

View the original article here

没有评论:

发表评论