CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS: Witnesses in prison dress and shackles

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Jnauary term opinions summarized

Posted today were summaries of each of the 66 opinions issued in the January 2008 term of court, comprising 26 signed opinions and 40 per curiam opinions.

CASES HELD OVER: Four cases submitted for decision in the January 2008 term of court were held over, with an opinion to issue during the September term. Those cases are: (1) SAVARESE v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., No. 33443(Argued January 23, 2008); (2) RASHID v. TARAKJI, No. 33596 (Argued April 1, 2008); (3) STATE EX REL. HATFIELD v. PAINTER, No. 33668 (Argued April 16, 2008); (4) LAWYER DISC. BD. v. WILLIAM H. DUTY, No. 33069, (Original opinion withdrawn when the Court granted a petition for rehearing. The case was re-argued on May 25, 2008. Thereafter, Chief Justice Maynard recused himself from the case, and the case will be set for a second re-argument in the September term.)

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Unauthorized entry not element of daytime burglary

STATE v. JOSHUA LEE SLATER, No. 33659 (MAYNARD, C.J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Benjamin, J., concurring)(June 9, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County for the offenses of kidnaping, domestic battery, wanton endangerment and daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Holding that unauthorized entry is not an element of the crime of daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Further holding that the circuit court properly sentenced the defendant to life with mercy on the kidnaping charge, where there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that a concession was obtained. Further concluding that the sentence was within statutory limits and therefore not reviewable, that the jury's questions during deliberations were not the type requiring explanation beyond referring to the jury instructions, and that other objections to the jury instructions were waived by defense counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Insufficient evidence to support obstruction convictions

STATE v. WANDA CARNEY and BETTY JARVIS, No. 33522 (Per Curiam)(April 25, 2008). Reversing convictions for one count each of obstructing a police officer and conspiracy to obstruct a police officer. Because the conduct was effected without force, reiterating that any obstruction conviction must be supported by conduct that is unlawful or illegal. Holding that none of the three instances cited by the State involved illegal conduct, and there was no evidence that law enforcement's investigation was impeded. Because there is no evidence to support the obstruction convictions, the conspiracy conviction fails as well.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Improper comment on defendant's silence

STATE v. MINDY KEESECKER, No. 33377 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, C.J., dissenting)(April 25, 2008). Reversing a jury conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Mercer County for six counts of sexual assault in the third degree. Holding that during closing argument the prosecutor improperly referred to the defendant's decision not to testify at trial. In light of the fact that the State's substantive evidence consisted only of the testimony of the victim and a prior written statement by the defendant, the prosecutor's statements were erroneous and prejudicial, and were not harmless error. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, CONSTITUTIONAL :: Improper burden-shifting on ability to pay child support

STATE v. DAVID GABRIEL STAMM, No. 33505 (DAVIS, J.)(May 23, 2008). Reversing a conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, for the felony offense of failure to meet an obligation to provide support to a minor under W. Va. Code 61-5-29. Holding, in syllabus point 5 that: "Insofar as W.Va. Code 61-5-29(3)(1999)(Repl. Vol. 2005) shifts to a defendant the burden of disproving a material element of the State's case, in violation of the due process clauses found in Article II, Section 10, of the Constitution of West Virginia, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that individual provision, severed from the remainder of W. Va. Code 61-5-29, is unconstitutional and unenforceable. W. Va. Code Sections 61-5-29(1) and (2) remain fully enforceable." Under the circumstances of the case, further holding that a jury instructions did not render harmless the constitutional error of the burden-shifting statute, because the jury instructions could have misled the jury into believing that the defendant bore the burden of proof as to his ability to pay support. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Clergy-communicant privilege, proof of age difference

STATE v. JOHN LOWERY, No. 33660 (Per Curiam)(May 27, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County on two felony counts of sexual assault in the third degree and two misdemeanor counts of sexual abuse in the third degree. Holding that admission of a pastor's testimony was proper because the defendant did not make any confidential communication or confession to the pastor witness that was revealed by the pastor's testimony. Further holding that the trial court properly decided not to declare a mistrial after an outburst by a spectator, where the trial court immediately ejected the spectator and gave the jury a curative instruction. Finally holding that the four-year age difference required under the felony counts was adequately proven by the State's evidence that the victim was fifteen, the jury's ability to observe the appearance of the defendant, and the jury's knowledge of the fact that the defendant was married with children.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Expert testimony on diminished capacity

STATE v. DREU FERGUSON, JR., No. 33530 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Mason County that denied a motion for new trial following a jury conviction for voluntary manslaughter. Holding that the circuit court improperly struck expert testimony presented by the defendant. Holding that the expert testimony sufficiently set forth that the defendant's mental state at the time of the crime would have prevented him from forming intent to kill, thus establishing the diminished capacity defense. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Invited error, intrinsic evidence

STATE v. HAROLD LEE CYRUS, No. 33453 (Per Curiam)(February 20, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County imposing sentence on two counts of sexual abuse by a custodian and two counts of incest. Holding that the state did not improperly present expert testimony of a CPS worker and a nurse practitioner. Holding at the witnesses were presented as fact witnesses by the state, and that expert testimony was elicited by the defendant's counsel on cross examination, and was therefore invited error. Further holding that evidence of abuse in McDowell County was intrinsic evidence not subject to Rule 404(b). Finally holding that there was no error in the admission of evidence from abuse & neglect proceedings, where both the state and the defendant relied upon those proceedings.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Consumption of evidence and defendant's ability to test

STATE EX REL. RONALD W. HOLCOMB v. SADLER, No. 33669 (Per Curiam)(February 15, 2008). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent enforcement of an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County that would permit DNA testing of fingernail scrapings of the 5 year-old victim, in a prosecution charging first degree murder and death of a child by a parent due to child abuse. Holding that the possibility of consumption of the evidence did not unfairly infringe upon the defendant's right to independent testing and cross examination, where appropriate protocols are available to be followed during the testing, such that the defendant's request for relief in prohibition is not warranted at this time.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS :: Witnesses in prison attire and shackles

GARY ALLEN GIBSON v. McBRIDE, No. 33321 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(June 12, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that granted habeas corpus relief and set aside a conviction for conspiracy to commit a murder that took place at the former West Virginia Penitentiary in Moundsville. Holding that the circuit court properly concluded that the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial was violated when the trial court allowed key witnesses for the State, who were incarcerated at the time of trial, to testify in civilian clothing and without shackles while key defense witnesses, who were also incarcerated at the time of trial, testified wearing prison attire and were forced to wear shackles.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JUVENILES :: Separate charges subsequent to transfer

STATE v. JAMES LEE BROOKS, III, No. 33662 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(May 23, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court on Monongalia for the offenses of conspiracy to commit first-degree robbery, malicious assault, and conspiracy to commit malicious assault. (This case was granted only as to a single assignment of error.) Rejecting appellant's contention that his transfer from juvenile to adult jurisdiction solely on the charge of first-degree robbery precluded indictment on additional related charges, because those charges were formally not part of the basis for the original transfer. Holding, in syllabus point 2, that where the transfer is mandatory under W.Va. Code 49-5-10(d)(2)(2001)(Repl. Vol. 2004) "there is no statutory impediment that prevents the State form charging the juvenile by indictment with offenses that were not included in the transfer motion and/or hearing provided those additional offenses flow from the same factual allegations of criminal activity that were the subject of the transfer hearing."

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, PROCEDURE :: Late disclosure, denial of continuance

STATE v. OWEN HAWK, III, No. 33435 (Per Curiam)(April 7, 2008). Affirming conviction for the offense of fleeing from an officer while under the influence of alcohol, obtained following jury trial in the Circuit Court of Roane County. Holding that the lower court did not err in denying a continuance due to disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence on the evening before trial, where the evidence in question - the identity of another arrestee who may have witnessed certain conduct by the police after the defendant was arrested - was not material to the pending charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

HABEAS CORPUS, PROCEDURE :: Denial of relief without evidentiary hearing

STATE EX REL. JAMES BLAINE WALDRON v. SCOTT, No. 33434 (Per Curiam)(March 18, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that denied habeas corpus relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Holding that although the order failed to make specific findings as to why an evidentiary hearing was not required, such omission was harmless in light of the fact that each issue raised was exhaustively addressed in the circuit court's order; and further in light of the fact that several of the issues were previously and finally adjudicated in the petitioner's direct appeal. The circuit court addressed the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a very detailed fashion, and correctly held that the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard could not be satisfied.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Delay in receipt of officer's statement

CARPENTER v. CICCHIRILLO, COMMISSIONER, No. 33654 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that reversed an administrative decision to revoke a driver's license for driving under the influence. Holding that a minor delay in receipt of the Statement of Arresting Officer did not deprive the DMV of its duty to investigate and consider license revocation once it received the paperwork. In light of the fact that the driver was not subject to actual prejudice because of the delay, the circuit court erred in reversing the DMV's revocation decision.??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here

CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS: Witnesses in prison dress and shackles

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Jnauary term opinions summarized

Posted today were summaries of each of the 66 opinions issued in the January 2008 term of court, comprising 26 signed opinions and 40 per curiam opinions.

CASES HELD OVER: Four cases submitted for decision in the January 2008 term of court were held over, with an opinion to issue during the September term. Those cases are: (1) SAVARESE v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., No. 33443(Argued January 23, 2008); (2) RASHID v. TARAKJI, No. 33596 (Argued April 1, 2008); (3) STATE EX REL. HATFIELD v. PAINTER, No. 33668 (Argued April 16, 2008); (4) LAWYER DISC. BD. v. WILLIAM H. DUTY, No. 33069, (Original opinion withdrawn when the Court granted a petition for rehearing. The case was re-argued on May 25, 2008. Thereafter, Chief Justice Maynard recused himself from the case, and the case will be set for a second re-argument in the September term.)

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Unauthorized entry not element of daytime burglary

STATE v. JOSHUA LEE SLATER, No. 33659 (MAYNARD, C.J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Benjamin, J., concurring)(June 9, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County for the offenses of kidnaping, domestic battery, wanton endangerment and daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Holding that unauthorized entry is not an element of the crime of daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Further holding that the circuit court properly sentenced the defendant to life with mercy on the kidnaping charge, where there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that a concession was obtained. Further concluding that the sentence was within statutory limits and therefore not reviewable, that the jury's questions during deliberations were not the type requiring explanation beyond referring to the jury instructions, and that other objections to the jury instructions were waived by defense counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Insufficient evidence to support obstruction convictions

STATE v. WANDA CARNEY and BETTY JARVIS, No. 33522 (Per Curiam)(April 25, 2008). Reversing convictions for one count each of obstructing a police officer and conspiracy to obstruct a police officer. Because the conduct was effected without force, reiterating that any obstruction conviction must be supported by conduct that is unlawful or illegal. Holding that none of the three instances cited by the State involved illegal conduct, and there was no evidence that law enforcement's investigation was impeded. Because there is no evidence to support the obstruction convictions, the conspiracy conviction fails as well.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Improper comment on defendant's silence

STATE v. MINDY KEESECKER, No. 33377 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, C.J., dissenting)(April 25, 2008). Reversing a jury conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Mercer County for six counts of sexual assault in the third degree. Holding that during closing argument the prosecutor improperly referred to the defendant's decision not to testify at trial. In light of the fact that the State's substantive evidence consisted only of the testimony of the victim and a prior written statement by the defendant, the prosecutor's statements were erroneous and prejudicial, and were not harmless error. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, CONSTITUTIONAL :: Improper burden-shifting on ability to pay child support

STATE v. DAVID GABRIEL STAMM, No. 33505 (DAVIS, J.)(May 23, 2008). Reversing a conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, for the felony offense of failure to meet an obligation to provide support to a minor under W. Va. Code 61-5-29. Holding, in syllabus point 5 that: "Insofar as W.Va. Code 61-5-29(3)(1999)(Repl. Vol. 2005) shifts to a defendant the burden of disproving a material element of the State's case, in violation of the due process clauses found in Article II, Section 10, of the Constitution of West Virginia, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that individual provision, severed from the remainder of W. Va. Code 61-5-29, is unconstitutional and unenforceable. W. Va. Code Sections 61-5-29(1) and (2) remain fully enforceable." Under the circumstances of the case, further holding that a jury instructions did not render harmless the constitutional error of the burden-shifting statute, because the jury instructions could have misled the jury into believing that the defendant bore the burden of proof as to his ability to pay support. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Clergy-communicant privilege, proof of age difference

STATE v. JOHN LOWERY, No. 33660 (Per Curiam)(May 27, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County on two felony counts of sexual assault in the third degree and two misdemeanor counts of sexual abuse in the third degree. Holding that admission of a pastor's testimony was proper because the defendant did not make any confidential communication or confession to the pastor witness that was revealed by the pastor's testimony. Further holding that the trial court properly decided not to declare a mistrial after an outburst by a spectator, where the trial court immediately ejected the spectator and gave the jury a curative instruction. Finally holding that the four-year age difference required under the felony counts was adequately proven by the State's evidence that the victim was fifteen, the jury's ability to observe the appearance of the defendant, and the jury's knowledge of the fact that the defendant was married with children.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Expert testimony on diminished capacity

STATE v. DREU FERGUSON, JR., No. 33530 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Mason County that denied a motion for new trial following a jury conviction for voluntary manslaughter. Holding that the circuit court improperly struck expert testimony presented by the defendant. Holding that the expert testimony sufficiently set forth that the defendant's mental state at the time of the crime would have prevented him from forming intent to kill, thus establishing the diminished capacity defense. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Invited error, intrinsic evidence

STATE v. HAROLD LEE CYRUS, No. 33453 (Per Curiam)(February 20, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County imposing sentence on two counts of sexual abuse by a custodian and two counts of incest. Holding that the state did not improperly present expert testimony of a CPS worker and a nurse practitioner. Holding at the witnesses were presented as fact witnesses by the state, and that expert testimony was elicited by the defendant's counsel on cross examination, and was therefore invited error. Further holding that evidence of abuse in McDowell County was intrinsic evidence not subject to Rule 404(b). Finally holding that there was no error in the admission of evidence from abuse & neglect proceedings, where both the state and the defendant relied upon those proceedings.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Consumption of evidence and defendant's ability to test

STATE EX REL. RONALD W. HOLCOMB v. SADLER, No. 33669 (Per Curiam)(February 15, 2008). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent enforcement of an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County that would permit DNA testing of fingernail scrapings of the 5 year-old victim, in a prosecution charging first degree murder and death of a child by a parent due to child abuse. Holding that the possibility of consumption of the evidence did not unfairly infringe upon the defendant's right to independent testing and cross examination, where appropriate protocols are available to be followed during the testing, such that the defendant's request for relief in prohibition is not warranted at this time.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS :: Witnesses in prison attire and shackles

GARY ALLEN GIBSON v. McBRIDE, No. 33321 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(June 12, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that granted habeas corpus relief and set aside a conviction for conspiracy to commit a murder that took place at the former West Virginia Penitentiary in Moundsville. Holding that the circuit court properly concluded that the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial was violated when the trial court allowed key witnesses for the State, who were incarcerated at the time of trial, to testify in civilian clothing and without shackles while key defense witnesses, who were also incarcerated at the time of trial, testified wearing prison attire and were forced to wear shackles.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JUVENILES :: Separate charges subsequent to transfer

STATE v. JAMES LEE BROOKS, III, No. 33662 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(May 23, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court on Monongalia for the offenses of conspiracy to commit first-degree robbery, malicious assault, and conspiracy to commit malicious assault. (This case was granted only as to a single assignment of error.) Rejecting appellant's contention that his transfer from juvenile to adult jurisdiction solely on the charge of first-degree robbery precluded indictment on additional related charges, because those charges were formally not part of the basis for the original transfer. Holding, in syllabus point 2, that where the transfer is mandatory under W.Va. Code 49-5-10(d)(2)(2001)(Repl. Vol. 2004) "there is no statutory impediment that prevents the State form charging the juvenile by indictment with offenses that were not included in the transfer motion and/or hearing provided those additional offenses flow from the same factual allegations of criminal activity that were the subject of the transfer hearing."

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, PROCEDURE :: Late disclosure, denial of continuance

STATE v. OWEN HAWK, III, No. 33435 (Per Curiam)(April 7, 2008). Affirming conviction for the offense of fleeing from an officer while under the influence of alcohol, obtained following jury trial in the Circuit Court of Roane County. Holding that the lower court did not err in denying a continuance due to disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence on the evening before trial, where the evidence in question - the identity of another arrestee who may have witnessed certain conduct by the police after the defendant was arrested - was not material to the pending charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

HABEAS CORPUS, PROCEDURE :: Denial of relief without evidentiary hearing

STATE EX REL. JAMES BLAINE WALDRON v. SCOTT, No. 33434 (Per Curiam)(March 18, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that denied habeas corpus relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Holding that although the order failed to make specific findings as to why an evidentiary hearing was not required, such omission was harmless in light of the fact that each issue raised was exhaustively addressed in the circuit court's order; and further in light of the fact that several of the issues were previously and finally adjudicated in the petitioner's direct appeal. The circuit court addressed the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a very detailed fashion, and correctly held that the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard could not be satisfied.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Delay in receipt of officer's statement

CARPENTER v. CICCHIRILLO, COMMISSIONER, No. 33654 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that reversed an administrative decision to revoke a driver's license for driving under the influence. Holding that a minor delay in receipt of the Statement of Arresting Officer did not deprive the DMV of its duty to investigate and consider license revocation once it received the paperwork. In light of the fact that the driver was not subject to actual prejudice because of the delay, the circuit court erred in reversing the DMV's revocation decision.??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here

HABEAS CORPUS procedure:: Denial of discharge without evidentiary hearings

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Jnauary term opinions summarized

Posted today were summaries of each of the 66 opinions issued in the January 2008 term of court, comprising 26 signed opinions and 40 per curiam opinions.

CASES HELD OVER: Four cases submitted for decision in the January 2008 term of court were held over, with an opinion to issue during the September term. Those cases are: (1) SAVARESE v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., No. 33443(Argued January 23, 2008); (2) RASHID v. TARAKJI, No. 33596 (Argued April 1, 2008); (3) STATE EX REL. HATFIELD v. PAINTER, No. 33668 (Argued April 16, 2008); (4) LAWYER DISC. BD. v. WILLIAM H. DUTY, No. 33069, (Original opinion withdrawn when the Court granted a petition for rehearing. The case was re-argued on May 25, 2008. Thereafter, Chief Justice Maynard recused himself from the case, and the case will be set for a second re-argument in the September term.)

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Unauthorized entry not element of daytime burglary

STATE v. JOSHUA LEE SLATER, No. 33659 (MAYNARD, C.J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Benjamin, J., concurring)(June 9, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County for the offenses of kidnaping, domestic battery, wanton endangerment and daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Holding that unauthorized entry is not an element of the crime of daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Further holding that the circuit court properly sentenced the defendant to life with mercy on the kidnaping charge, where there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that a concession was obtained. Further concluding that the sentence was within statutory limits and therefore not reviewable, that the jury's questions during deliberations were not the type requiring explanation beyond referring to the jury instructions, and that other objections to the jury instructions were waived by defense counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Insufficient evidence to support obstruction convictions

STATE v. WANDA CARNEY and BETTY JARVIS, No. 33522 (Per Curiam)(April 25, 2008). Reversing convictions for one count each of obstructing a police officer and conspiracy to obstruct a police officer. Because the conduct was effected without force, reiterating that any obstruction conviction must be supported by conduct that is unlawful or illegal. Holding that none of the three instances cited by the State involved illegal conduct, and there was no evidence that law enforcement's investigation was impeded. Because there is no evidence to support the obstruction convictions, the conspiracy conviction fails as well.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Improper comment on defendant's silence

STATE v. MINDY KEESECKER, No. 33377 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, C.J., dissenting)(April 25, 2008). Reversing a jury conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Mercer County for six counts of sexual assault in the third degree. Holding that during closing argument the prosecutor improperly referred to the defendant's decision not to testify at trial. In light of the fact that the State's substantive evidence consisted only of the testimony of the victim and a prior written statement by the defendant, the prosecutor's statements were erroneous and prejudicial, and were not harmless error. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, CONSTITUTIONAL :: Improper burden-shifting on ability to pay child support

STATE v. DAVID GABRIEL STAMM, No. 33505 (DAVIS, J.)(May 23, 2008). Reversing a conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, for the felony offense of failure to meet an obligation to provide support to a minor under W. Va. Code 61-5-29. Holding, in syllabus point 5 that: "Insofar as W.Va. Code 61-5-29(3)(1999)(Repl. Vol. 2005) shifts to a defendant the burden of disproving a material element of the State's case, in violation of the due process clauses found in Article II, Section 10, of the Constitution of West Virginia, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that individual provision, severed from the remainder of W. Va. Code 61-5-29, is unconstitutional and unenforceable. W. Va. Code Sections 61-5-29(1) and (2) remain fully enforceable." Under the circumstances of the case, further holding that a jury instructions did not render harmless the constitutional error of the burden-shifting statute, because the jury instructions could have misled the jury into believing that the defendant bore the burden of proof as to his ability to pay support. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Clergy-communicant privilege, proof of age difference

STATE v. JOHN LOWERY, No. 33660 (Per Curiam)(May 27, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County on two felony counts of sexual assault in the third degree and two misdemeanor counts of sexual abuse in the third degree. Holding that admission of a pastor's testimony was proper because the defendant did not make any confidential communication or confession to the pastor witness that was revealed by the pastor's testimony. Further holding that the trial court properly decided not to declare a mistrial after an outburst by a spectator, where the trial court immediately ejected the spectator and gave the jury a curative instruction. Finally holding that the four-year age difference required under the felony counts was adequately proven by the State's evidence that the victim was fifteen, the jury's ability to observe the appearance of the defendant, and the jury's knowledge of the fact that the defendant was married with children.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Expert testimony on diminished capacity

STATE v. DREU FERGUSON, JR., No. 33530 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Mason County that denied a motion for new trial following a jury conviction for voluntary manslaughter. Holding that the circuit court improperly struck expert testimony presented by the defendant. Holding that the expert testimony sufficiently set forth that the defendant's mental state at the time of the crime would have prevented him from forming intent to kill, thus establishing the diminished capacity defense. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Invited error, intrinsic evidence

STATE v. HAROLD LEE CYRUS, No. 33453 (Per Curiam)(February 20, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County imposing sentence on two counts of sexual abuse by a custodian and two counts of incest. Holding that the state did not improperly present expert testimony of a CPS worker and a nurse practitioner. Holding at the witnesses were presented as fact witnesses by the state, and that expert testimony was elicited by the defendant's counsel on cross examination, and was therefore invited error. Further holding that evidence of abuse in McDowell County was intrinsic evidence not subject to Rule 404(b). Finally holding that there was no error in the admission of evidence from abuse & neglect proceedings, where both the state and the defendant relied upon those proceedings.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Consumption of evidence and defendant's ability to test

STATE EX REL. RONALD W. HOLCOMB v. SADLER, No. 33669 (Per Curiam)(February 15, 2008). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent enforcement of an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County that would permit DNA testing of fingernail scrapings of the 5 year-old victim, in a prosecution charging first degree murder and death of a child by a parent due to child abuse. Holding that the possibility of consumption of the evidence did not unfairly infringe upon the defendant's right to independent testing and cross examination, where appropriate protocols are available to be followed during the testing, such that the defendant's request for relief in prohibition is not warranted at this time.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS :: Witnesses in prison attire and shackles

GARY ALLEN GIBSON v. McBRIDE, No. 33321 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(June 12, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that granted habeas corpus relief and set aside a conviction for conspiracy to commit a murder that took place at the former West Virginia Penitentiary in Moundsville. Holding that the circuit court properly concluded that the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial was violated when the trial court allowed key witnesses for the State, who were incarcerated at the time of trial, to testify in civilian clothing and without shackles while key defense witnesses, who were also incarcerated at the time of trial, testified wearing prison attire and were forced to wear shackles.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JUVENILES :: Separate charges subsequent to transfer

STATE v. JAMES LEE BROOKS, III, No. 33662 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(May 23, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court on Monongalia for the offenses of conspiracy to commit first-degree robbery, malicious assault, and conspiracy to commit malicious assault. (This case was granted only as to a single assignment of error.) Rejecting appellant's contention that his transfer from juvenile to adult jurisdiction solely on the charge of first-degree robbery precluded indictment on additional related charges, because those charges were formally not part of the basis for the original transfer. Holding, in syllabus point 2, that where the transfer is mandatory under W.Va. Code 49-5-10(d)(2)(2001)(Repl. Vol. 2004) "there is no statutory impediment that prevents the State form charging the juvenile by indictment with offenses that were not included in the transfer motion and/or hearing provided those additional offenses flow from the same factual allegations of criminal activity that were the subject of the transfer hearing."

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, PROCEDURE :: Late disclosure, denial of continuance

STATE v. OWEN HAWK, III, No. 33435 (Per Curiam)(April 7, 2008). Affirming conviction for the offense of fleeing from an officer while under the influence of alcohol, obtained following jury trial in the Circuit Court of Roane County. Holding that the lower court did not err in denying a continuance due to disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence on the evening before trial, where the evidence in question - the identity of another arrestee who may have witnessed certain conduct by the police after the defendant was arrested - was not material to the pending charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

HABEAS CORPUS, PROCEDURE :: Denial of relief without evidentiary hearing

STATE EX REL. JAMES BLAINE WALDRON v. SCOTT, No. 33434 (Per Curiam)(March 18, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that denied habeas corpus relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Holding that although the order failed to make specific findings as to why an evidentiary hearing was not required, such omission was harmless in light of the fact that each issue raised was exhaustively addressed in the circuit court's order; and further in light of the fact that several of the issues were previously and finally adjudicated in the petitioner's direct appeal. The circuit court addressed the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a very detailed fashion, and correctly held that the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard could not be satisfied.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Delay in receipt of officer's statement

CARPENTER v. CICCHIRILLO, COMMISSIONER, No. 33654 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that reversed an administrative decision to revoke a driver's license for driving under the influence. Holding that a minor delay in receipt of the Statement of Arresting Officer did not deprive the DMV of its duty to investigate and consider license revocation once it received the paperwork. In light of the fact that the driver was not subject to actual prejudice because of the delay, the circuit court erred in reversing the DMV's revocation decision.??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here

CRIMINAL: proportionality of 212 year sentence. effectiveness of hearing habeas waived

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Friday, February 1, 2008

CRIMINAL :: Numerous errors rejected, second degree murder

STATE v. ERIC ALLEN FOSTER, No. 33323 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., disqualified)(Moats, Judge, by temporary assignment)(November 19, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County imposing two consecutive forty-year sentences upon jury conviction for two counts of second degree murder. Rejecting assertions that there was insufficient evidence of intent. Further holding that certain jury instructions and selection of certain jurors did not constitute plain error, and that there was no per se ineffective assistance of counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL :: Negligent homicide

STATE ex rel. NELSON, Prosecuting Attorney v. FRYE, No. 33499 (Per Curiam)(November 8, 2007). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent dismissal of negligent homicide charges following a logging truck accident that resulted in the death of another driver. Holding that where the evidence showed that the truck driver was in excess of the recommended speed, but not over the speed limit, there was insufficient evidence of reckless disregard to sustain the charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Incest, sexual assault, double jeopardy

STATE v. JONATHON FREEMONT RAY, No. 33324 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring)(Albright, J., concurring)(November 8, 2007). Affirming sentences upon multiple convictions for sexual assault, incest and other sex-based offenses imposed by the Circuit Court of Preston County. Rejecting defendant's assertion that consanguinity is an element of the offense of incest, and holding that the statutory definition of incest is met where the victims were stepchildren of the defendant's biological brother. Further rejecting the assertion that double jeopardy prevents convictions for sexual assault and incest arising from the same incident. Applying the Blockburger test to determine that each offense requires a separate element to be proven.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Sufficient evidence to support sexual abuse by custodian

STATE v. KENNETH RAY COLLLINS, No. 33300 (Per Curiam). Affirming a conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Mingo County upon conviction for one count of sexual abuse in the third degree and one count of sexual abuse by a parent, guardian or custodian. Holding that the record ?- including evidence that the defendant "controlled and supervised the eleven year old girl on numerous, albeit temporary, occasions when he would take her away from home to go riding on his four-wheeler" -- reveals a sufficient basis for the jury to conclude that the defendant met the statutory definition of custodian.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Lesser-included misdemeanor, statute of limitations defense waived

STATE v. DANIEL B. BINGMAN, No. 33299 (Per Curiam)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Albright, J., dissenting)(October 26, 2007). Affirming a conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Gilmer County upon conviction for one count of petit larceny in violation of W. Va. Code 61-3-13(b). The indictment for grand larceny occurred more than one year after the offense. Holding that defense counsel failed to object to jury instructions on the lesser-included offense, thereby waiving any statute of limitations defense that could be asserted, in accord with rule announced in syllabus point 3 of STATE v. BOYD, 209 W. Va. 90, 543 S.E.2d 647 (2000).

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Assessment of jury costs on defense counsel reversed

STATE EX REL. TERRON GODFREY v. ROWE, No. 33444 (Per Curiam)(Davis, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(October 16, 2007). Granting a moulded writ of prohibition to prevent enforcement of an order imposing jury costs on defense counsel following a mistrial. Holding that the trial court properly rejected defendant's assertion that the second trial was barred by double jeopardy. Further denying as premature relief sought in relation to a motion to join counts of a subsequent indictment and directing the circuit court to address the joinder motion.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: No prejudice in trial court amending indictment

STATE v. RICHARD ALLEN HAINES, No. 33304 (Per Curiam)(October 12, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Hampshire County that imposed sentence upon a jury conviction for one count of felony delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance. Rejecting appellant's contention that the trial court erred in amending the indictment, which had erroneously identified methamphetamine as a Schedule I controlled substance. Holding that the trial court properly concluded that the amendment was not substantial and did not require resubmission to the grand jury in light of the fact that the appellant was not misled, there was no additional burden of proof, and he was not prejudiced as a result of the amendment.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS, ATTORNEYS :: Ineffective assistance of counsel in mercy phase

STATE EX REL. SHANE SHELTON v. PAINTER, Warden, No. 33322 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(Benjamin, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(November 21, 2007). Granting mixed relief from an order of the Circuit Court of Ohio County that denied a post-conviction habeas corpus petition after conducting an evidentiary hearing. After testifying at trial and admitting that he shot the victim, Shelton was convicted of first degree murder without mercy. Reviewing the single issue of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, and holding that defense counsel betrayed his duty of loyalty to his client during closing argument by equivocating about whether his client deserved mercy, by failing to introduce any evidence in support of mercy, and by failing to make any meaningful plea for mercy, especially when combined with counsel's over-emphasis of his client's obvious guilt. Declining to remand for new trial on the issue of guilt, and requiring a limited new trial only on the penalty issue of whether Shelton should or should not receive mercy.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Improper search

STATE v. KENNETH BOOKHEIMER and STATE v. JESSICA TINGLER, Nos. 33289 and 33290 (Per Curiam)(Starcher, J., concurring)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(Albright, J., concurring)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(November 8, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Reversing orders of the Circuit Court of Braxton County that imposed sentences on convictions of conspiracy and operating a clandestine drug laboratory. Holding that the circuit court erred by allowing introduction of evidence seized as the result of an illegal search. Holding that agitated behavior by a resident upon the officer's arrival after receipt of a call regarding a domestic dispute did not create an emergency or exigent circumstance justifying warrantless entry into the mobile home. Neither party consented, officers were asked to leave, and there was no indication that a protective sweep was warranted or justified. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: 404(b) violations during cross-examination of defendant

STATE v. DAVID NELSON, No. 33188. (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(Starcher, J., concurring)(October 30, 2007). Reversing jury convictions of six felony offenses related to the death of Wanda Lesher, upon which the defendant had been sentenced to two terms of life without mercy, among other sentences to be served consecutively, on the basis that the defendant was denied a fair trial. Where defendant relied upon an alibi defense and testified at trial, it was error to permit the State on cross-examination to raise alleged acts of past misconduct that were unverified, inflammatory and not subjected to the requirements of Rule 404(b). The alleged acts were also not admissible in the context of rebuttal upon the issue of character.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JURY :: New trial awarded due to juror misconduct

STATE v. DANNY L. CECIL, No. 33298 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(November 21, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Putnam County imposing sentence upon jury convictions for multiple sex crimes. Rejecting several trial errors, including an assertion that the trial court improperly limited a defense expert with statistical evidence tending to undermine the veracity of assertions of sexual abuse victims. Reversing and remanding for a new trial in light of multiple instances of juror misconduct including investigation extrinsic to the deliberation process and one juror who contradicted the court's instructions on the weight to be given to testimony of witnesses. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JURY :: Juror who worked with law enforcement properly seated

STATE v. WILLIAM MILLS, JR., No. 33340 (Per Curiam)(October 25, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that imposed sentence upon a jury conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. Rejecting appellant's contention that the trial court erred in refusing to strike a juror for cause. The juror was in uniform as a medic for county emergency services and also served on a volunteer fire department with a potential state witness. Concluding that the appellant failed to demonstrate a disqualifying social relationship, and further failed to specifically inquire as to the nature of the juror's relationships with law enforcement officials, and that the juror was very clear about being able to remain impartial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


HEALTH CARE :: Incest conviction precludes operating legally unlicensed health care home

PLUMLEY v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPT. of HEALTH and HUMAN RESOURCES/OFFICE of HEALTH FACILITY LICENSURE and CERTIFICATION, No. 33287 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Maynard, J., concurring)(Albright, J., dissenting)(October 12, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that reversed an administrative order requiring closure of a "legally unlicensed health care home" as defined in West Virginia Code of State Rules 64-50-2.6. Holding that a conviction for felony incest, as revealed by a CIB background check, is sufficient to trigger a regulatory bar on operating such a health care home, because the conviction constitutes a crime relevant for the provision of care to a dependent population within the scope of W. Va. C.S.R. 64-50-4.4 (1999).

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

LOCAL GOVERNMENT, JAILS, PROCEDURE :: Regional jail fees

STATE EX REL. REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY v. COUNTY COMMISSION OF CABELL COUNTY, et al., No. 33347 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring)(November 21, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Granting a moulded writ of mandamus in a dispute over payments by a county commission to the regional jail authority to cover the daily cost of housing county inmates. Addressing the Court's authority to issue moulded writ relief in cases having statewide impact and affecting the public interest, and holding that the county commission is obligated to pay assessed per diem charges, but that the regional jail authority must promptly meet and formulate a proposed legislative rule as provided for by W. Va. Code 31-20-10(h), addressing issues of uniformity, calculation of the per diem rate, and further clarifying the documentation surrounding any future rate increases.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Post-Stump pleas of nolo contendere

STATE EX REL. BAKER v. BOLYARD, Dir. Div. Motor Vehicles, No. 33303 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Maynard, J., concurring)(October 30, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County that affirmed an administrative decision imposing a six-month driver's license revocation on December 9, 2005, upon receipt of a notification for magistrate court that the defendant entered a nolo contendere plea to first offense DUI. The fact that the plea took place between the Court's prior decision in STATE EX REL STUMP v. JOHNSON, 217 W.Va. 733, 619 S.E.2d 246 (2005) and the May 15, 2006 amendment to W. Va. C.S.R. 91-5-14.1 means that the revocation was automatic upon notification of the nolo contendere plea.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here

CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS: Witnesses in prison dress and shackles

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Jnauary term opinions summarized

Posted today were summaries of each of the 66 opinions issued in the January 2008 term of court, comprising 26 signed opinions and 40 per curiam opinions.

CASES HELD OVER: Four cases submitted for decision in the January 2008 term of court were held over, with an opinion to issue during the September term. Those cases are: (1) SAVARESE v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., No. 33443(Argued January 23, 2008); (2) RASHID v. TARAKJI, No. 33596 (Argued April 1, 2008); (3) STATE EX REL. HATFIELD v. PAINTER, No. 33668 (Argued April 16, 2008); (4) LAWYER DISC. BD. v. WILLIAM H. DUTY, No. 33069, (Original opinion withdrawn when the Court granted a petition for rehearing. The case was re-argued on May 25, 2008. Thereafter, Chief Justice Maynard recused himself from the case, and the case will be set for a second re-argument in the September term.)

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Unauthorized entry not element of daytime burglary

STATE v. JOSHUA LEE SLATER, No. 33659 (MAYNARD, C.J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Benjamin, J., concurring)(June 9, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County for the offenses of kidnaping, domestic battery, wanton endangerment and daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Holding that unauthorized entry is not an element of the crime of daytime burglary by breaking and entering. Further holding that the circuit court properly sentenced the defendant to life with mercy on the kidnaping charge, where there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that a concession was obtained. Further concluding that the sentence was within statutory limits and therefore not reviewable, that the jury's questions during deliberations were not the type requiring explanation beyond referring to the jury instructions, and that other objections to the jury instructions were waived by defense counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Insufficient evidence to support obstruction convictions

STATE v. WANDA CARNEY and BETTY JARVIS, No. 33522 (Per Curiam)(April 25, 2008). Reversing convictions for one count each of obstructing a police officer and conspiracy to obstruct a police officer. Because the conduct was effected without force, reiterating that any obstruction conviction must be supported by conduct that is unlawful or illegal. Holding that none of the three instances cited by the State involved illegal conduct, and there was no evidence that law enforcement's investigation was impeded. Because there is no evidence to support the obstruction convictions, the conspiracy conviction fails as well.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Improper comment on defendant's silence

STATE v. MINDY KEESECKER, No. 33377 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, C.J., dissenting)(April 25, 2008). Reversing a jury conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Mercer County for six counts of sexual assault in the third degree. Holding that during closing argument the prosecutor improperly referred to the defendant's decision not to testify at trial. In light of the fact that the State's substantive evidence consisted only of the testimony of the victim and a prior written statement by the defendant, the prosecutor's statements were erroneous and prejudicial, and were not harmless error. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, CONSTITUTIONAL :: Improper burden-shifting on ability to pay child support

STATE v. DAVID GABRIEL STAMM, No. 33505 (DAVIS, J.)(May 23, 2008). Reversing a conviction arising from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, for the felony offense of failure to meet an obligation to provide support to a minor under W. Va. Code 61-5-29. Holding, in syllabus point 5 that: "Insofar as W.Va. Code 61-5-29(3)(1999)(Repl. Vol. 2005) shifts to a defendant the burden of disproving a material element of the State's case, in violation of the due process clauses found in Article II, Section 10, of the Constitution of West Virginia, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that individual provision, severed from the remainder of W. Va. Code 61-5-29, is unconstitutional and unenforceable. W. Va. Code Sections 61-5-29(1) and (2) remain fully enforceable." Under the circumstances of the case, further holding that a jury instructions did not render harmless the constitutional error of the burden-shifting statute, because the jury instructions could have misled the jury into believing that the defendant bore the burden of proof as to his ability to pay support. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Clergy-communicant privilege, proof of age difference

STATE v. JOHN LOWERY, No. 33660 (Per Curiam)(May 27, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court of Kanawha County on two felony counts of sexual assault in the third degree and two misdemeanor counts of sexual abuse in the third degree. Holding that admission of a pastor's testimony was proper because the defendant did not make any confidential communication or confession to the pastor witness that was revealed by the pastor's testimony. Further holding that the trial court properly decided not to declare a mistrial after an outburst by a spectator, where the trial court immediately ejected the spectator and gave the jury a curative instruction. Finally holding that the four-year age difference required under the felony counts was adequately proven by the State's evidence that the victim was fifteen, the jury's ability to observe the appearance of the defendant, and the jury's knowledge of the fact that the defendant was married with children.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Expert testimony on diminished capacity

STATE v. DREU FERGUSON, JR., No. 33530 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Mason County that denied a motion for new trial following a jury conviction for voluntary manslaughter. Holding that the circuit court improperly struck expert testimony presented by the defendant. Holding that the expert testimony sufficiently set forth that the defendant's mental state at the time of the crime would have prevented him from forming intent to kill, thus establishing the diminished capacity defense. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Invited error, intrinsic evidence

STATE v. HAROLD LEE CYRUS, No. 33453 (Per Curiam)(February 20, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County imposing sentence on two counts of sexual abuse by a custodian and two counts of incest. Holding that the state did not improperly present expert testimony of a CPS worker and a nurse practitioner. Holding at the witnesses were presented as fact witnesses by the state, and that expert testimony was elicited by the defendant's counsel on cross examination, and was therefore invited error. Further holding that evidence of abuse in McDowell County was intrinsic evidence not subject to Rule 404(b). Finally holding that there was no error in the admission of evidence from abuse & neglect proceedings, where both the state and the defendant relied upon those proceedings.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Consumption of evidence and defendant's ability to test

STATE EX REL. RONALD W. HOLCOMB v. SADLER, No. 33669 (Per Curiam)(February 15, 2008). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent enforcement of an order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County that would permit DNA testing of fingernail scrapings of the 5 year-old victim, in a prosecution charging first degree murder and death of a child by a parent due to child abuse. Holding that the possibility of consumption of the evidence did not unfairly infringe upon the defendant's right to independent testing and cross examination, where appropriate protocols are available to be followed during the testing, such that the defendant's request for relief in prohibition is not warranted at this time.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS :: Witnesses in prison attire and shackles

GARY ALLEN GIBSON v. McBRIDE, No. 33321 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(June 12, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that granted habeas corpus relief and set aside a conviction for conspiracy to commit a murder that took place at the former West Virginia Penitentiary in Moundsville. Holding that the circuit court properly concluded that the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial was violated when the trial court allowed key witnesses for the State, who were incarcerated at the time of trial, to testify in civilian clothing and without shackles while key defense witnesses, who were also incarcerated at the time of trial, testified wearing prison attire and were forced to wear shackles.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JUVENILES :: Separate charges subsequent to transfer

STATE v. JAMES LEE BROOKS, III, No. 33662 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(May 23, 2008). Affirming jury convictions arising from the Circuit Court on Monongalia for the offenses of conspiracy to commit first-degree robbery, malicious assault, and conspiracy to commit malicious assault. (This case was granted only as to a single assignment of error.) Rejecting appellant's contention that his transfer from juvenile to adult jurisdiction solely on the charge of first-degree robbery precluded indictment on additional related charges, because those charges were formally not part of the basis for the original transfer. Holding, in syllabus point 2, that where the transfer is mandatory under W.Va. Code 49-5-10(d)(2)(2001)(Repl. Vol. 2004) "there is no statutory impediment that prevents the State form charging the juvenile by indictment with offenses that were not included in the transfer motion and/or hearing provided those additional offenses flow from the same factual allegations of criminal activity that were the subject of the transfer hearing."

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, PROCEDURE :: Late disclosure, denial of continuance

STATE v. OWEN HAWK, III, No. 33435 (Per Curiam)(April 7, 2008). Affirming conviction for the offense of fleeing from an officer while under the influence of alcohol, obtained following jury trial in the Circuit Court of Roane County. Holding that the lower court did not err in denying a continuance due to disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence on the evening before trial, where the evidence in question - the identity of another arrestee who may have witnessed certain conduct by the police after the defendant was arrested - was not material to the pending charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

HABEAS CORPUS, PROCEDURE :: Denial of relief without evidentiary hearing

STATE EX REL. JAMES BLAINE WALDRON v. SCOTT, No. 33434 (Per Curiam)(March 18, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that denied habeas corpus relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Holding that although the order failed to make specific findings as to why an evidentiary hearing was not required, such omission was harmless in light of the fact that each issue raised was exhaustively addressed in the circuit court's order; and further in light of the fact that several of the issues were previously and finally adjudicated in the petitioner's direct appeal. The circuit court addressed the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a very detailed fashion, and correctly held that the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard could not be satisfied.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Delay in receipt of officer's statement

CARPENTER v. CICCHIRILLO, COMMISSIONER, No. 33654 (Per Curiam)(February 28, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that reversed an administrative decision to revoke a driver's license for driving under the influence. Holding that a minor delay in receipt of the Statement of Arresting Officer did not deprive the DMV of its duty to investigate and consider license revocation once it received the paperwork. In light of the fact that the driver was not subject to actual prejudice because of the delay, the circuit court erred in reversing the DMV's revocation decision.??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here

CRIMINAL: proportionality of 212 year sentence. effectiveness of hearing habeas waived

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Friday, February 1, 2008

CRIMINAL :: Numerous errors rejected, second degree murder

STATE v. ERIC ALLEN FOSTER, No. 33323 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., disqualified)(Moats, Judge, by temporary assignment)(November 19, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County imposing two consecutive forty-year sentences upon jury conviction for two counts of second degree murder. Rejecting assertions that there was insufficient evidence of intent. Further holding that certain jury instructions and selection of certain jurors did not constitute plain error, and that there was no per se ineffective assistance of counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL :: Negligent homicide

STATE ex rel. NELSON, Prosecuting Attorney v. FRYE, No. 33499 (Per Curiam)(November 8, 2007). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent dismissal of negligent homicide charges following a logging truck accident that resulted in the death of another driver. Holding that where the evidence showed that the truck driver was in excess of the recommended speed, but not over the speed limit, there was insufficient evidence of reckless disregard to sustain the charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Incest, sexual assault, double jeopardy

STATE v. JONATHON FREEMONT RAY, No. 33324 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring)(Albright, J., concurring)(November 8, 2007). Affirming sentences upon multiple convictions for sexual assault, incest and other sex-based offenses imposed by the Circuit Court of Preston County. Rejecting defendant's assertion that consanguinity is an element of the offense of incest, and holding that the statutory definition of incest is met where the victims were stepchildren of the defendant's biological brother. Further rejecting the assertion that double jeopardy prevents convictions for sexual assault and incest arising from the same incident. Applying the Blockburger test to determine that each offense requires a separate element to be proven.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Sufficient evidence to support sexual abuse by custodian

STATE v. KENNETH RAY COLLLINS, No. 33300 (Per Curiam). Affirming a conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Mingo County upon conviction for one count of sexual abuse in the third degree and one count of sexual abuse by a parent, guardian or custodian. Holding that the record ?- including evidence that the defendant "controlled and supervised the eleven year old girl on numerous, albeit temporary, occasions when he would take her away from home to go riding on his four-wheeler" -- reveals a sufficient basis for the jury to conclude that the defendant met the statutory definition of custodian.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Lesser-included misdemeanor, statute of limitations defense waived

STATE v. DANIEL B. BINGMAN, No. 33299 (Per Curiam)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Albright, J., dissenting)(October 26, 2007). Affirming a conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Gilmer County upon conviction for one count of petit larceny in violation of W. Va. Code 61-3-13(b). The indictment for grand larceny occurred more than one year after the offense. Holding that defense counsel failed to object to jury instructions on the lesser-included offense, thereby waiving any statute of limitations defense that could be asserted, in accord with rule announced in syllabus point 3 of STATE v. BOYD, 209 W. Va. 90, 543 S.E.2d 647 (2000).

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Assessment of jury costs on defense counsel reversed

STATE EX REL. TERRON GODFREY v. ROWE, No. 33444 (Per Curiam)(Davis, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(October 16, 2007). Granting a moulded writ of prohibition to prevent enforcement of an order imposing jury costs on defense counsel following a mistrial. Holding that the trial court properly rejected defendant's assertion that the second trial was barred by double jeopardy. Further denying as premature relief sought in relation to a motion to join counts of a subsequent indictment and directing the circuit court to address the joinder motion.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: No prejudice in trial court amending indictment

STATE v. RICHARD ALLEN HAINES, No. 33304 (Per Curiam)(October 12, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Hampshire County that imposed sentence upon a jury conviction for one count of felony delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance. Rejecting appellant's contention that the trial court erred in amending the indictment, which had erroneously identified methamphetamine as a Schedule I controlled substance. Holding that the trial court properly concluded that the amendment was not substantial and did not require resubmission to the grand jury in light of the fact that the appellant was not misled, there was no additional burden of proof, and he was not prejudiced as a result of the amendment.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS, ATTORNEYS :: Ineffective assistance of counsel in mercy phase

STATE EX REL. SHANE SHELTON v. PAINTER, Warden, No. 33322 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(Benjamin, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(November 21, 2007). Granting mixed relief from an order of the Circuit Court of Ohio County that denied a post-conviction habeas corpus petition after conducting an evidentiary hearing. After testifying at trial and admitting that he shot the victim, Shelton was convicted of first degree murder without mercy. Reviewing the single issue of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, and holding that defense counsel betrayed his duty of loyalty to his client during closing argument by equivocating about whether his client deserved mercy, by failing to introduce any evidence in support of mercy, and by failing to make any meaningful plea for mercy, especially when combined with counsel's over-emphasis of his client's obvious guilt. Declining to remand for new trial on the issue of guilt, and requiring a limited new trial only on the penalty issue of whether Shelton should or should not receive mercy.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Improper search

STATE v. KENNETH BOOKHEIMER and STATE v. JESSICA TINGLER, Nos. 33289 and 33290 (Per Curiam)(Starcher, J., concurring)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(Albright, J., concurring)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(November 8, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Reversing orders of the Circuit Court of Braxton County that imposed sentences on convictions of conspiracy and operating a clandestine drug laboratory. Holding that the circuit court erred by allowing introduction of evidence seized as the result of an illegal search. Holding that agitated behavior by a resident upon the officer's arrival after receipt of a call regarding a domestic dispute did not create an emergency or exigent circumstance justifying warrantless entry into the mobile home. Neither party consented, officers were asked to leave, and there was no indication that a protective sweep was warranted or justified. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: 404(b) violations during cross-examination of defendant

STATE v. DAVID NELSON, No. 33188. (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(Starcher, J., concurring)(October 30, 2007). Reversing jury convictions of six felony offenses related to the death of Wanda Lesher, upon which the defendant had been sentenced to two terms of life without mercy, among other sentences to be served consecutively, on the basis that the defendant was denied a fair trial. Where defendant relied upon an alibi defense and testified at trial, it was error to permit the State on cross-examination to raise alleged acts of past misconduct that were unverified, inflammatory and not subjected to the requirements of Rule 404(b). The alleged acts were also not admissible in the context of rebuttal upon the issue of character.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JURY :: New trial awarded due to juror misconduct

STATE v. DANNY L. CECIL, No. 33298 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(November 21, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Putnam County imposing sentence upon jury convictions for multiple sex crimes. Rejecting several trial errors, including an assertion that the trial court improperly limited a defense expert with statistical evidence tending to undermine the veracity of assertions of sexual abuse victims. Reversing and remanding for a new trial in light of multiple instances of juror misconduct including investigation extrinsic to the deliberation process and one juror who contradicted the court's instructions on the weight to be given to testimony of witnesses. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JURY :: Juror who worked with law enforcement properly seated

STATE v. WILLIAM MILLS, JR., No. 33340 (Per Curiam)(October 25, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that imposed sentence upon a jury conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. Rejecting appellant's contention that the trial court erred in refusing to strike a juror for cause. The juror was in uniform as a medic for county emergency services and also served on a volunteer fire department with a potential state witness. Concluding that the appellant failed to demonstrate a disqualifying social relationship, and further failed to specifically inquire as to the nature of the juror's relationships with law enforcement officials, and that the juror was very clear about being able to remain impartial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


HEALTH CARE :: Incest conviction precludes operating legally unlicensed health care home

PLUMLEY v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPT. of HEALTH and HUMAN RESOURCES/OFFICE of HEALTH FACILITY LICENSURE and CERTIFICATION, No. 33287 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Maynard, J., concurring)(Albright, J., dissenting)(October 12, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that reversed an administrative order requiring closure of a "legally unlicensed health care home" as defined in West Virginia Code of State Rules 64-50-2.6. Holding that a conviction for felony incest, as revealed by a CIB background check, is sufficient to trigger a regulatory bar on operating such a health care home, because the conviction constitutes a crime relevant for the provision of care to a dependent population within the scope of W. Va. C.S.R. 64-50-4.4 (1999).

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

LOCAL GOVERNMENT, JAILS, PROCEDURE :: Regional jail fees

STATE EX REL. REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY v. COUNTY COMMISSION OF CABELL COUNTY, et al., No. 33347 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring)(November 21, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Granting a moulded writ of mandamus in a dispute over payments by a county commission to the regional jail authority to cover the daily cost of housing county inmates. Addressing the Court's authority to issue moulded writ relief in cases having statewide impact and affecting the public interest, and holding that the county commission is obligated to pay assessed per diem charges, but that the regional jail authority must promptly meet and formulate a proposed legislative rule as provided for by W. Va. Code 31-20-10(h), addressing issues of uniformity, calculation of the per diem rate, and further clarifying the documentation surrounding any future rate increases.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Post-Stump pleas of nolo contendere

STATE EX REL. BAKER v. BOLYARD, Dir. Div. Motor Vehicles, No. 33303 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Maynard, J., concurring)(October 30, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County that affirmed an administrative decision imposing a six-month driver's license revocation on December 9, 2005, upon receipt of a notification for magistrate court that the defendant entered a nolo contendere plea to first offense DUI. The fact that the plea took place between the Court's prior decision in STATE EX REL STUMP v. JOHNSON, 217 W.Va. 733, 619 S.E.2d 246 (2005) and the May 15, 2006 amendment to W. Va. C.S.R. 91-5-14.1 means that the revocation was automatic upon notification of the nolo contendere plea.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here

CRIMINAL: proportionality of 212 year sentence. effectiveness of hearing habeas waived

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Office of the Clerk
Case Topics: Criminal
Information about WV Supreme Court cases in the area of criminal law

?Friday, February 1, 2008

CRIMINAL :: Numerous errors rejected, second degree murder

STATE v. ERIC ALLEN FOSTER, No. 33323 (Per Curiam)(Benjamin, J., disqualified)(Moats, Judge, by temporary assignment)(November 19, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County imposing two consecutive forty-year sentences upon jury conviction for two counts of second degree murder. Rejecting assertions that there was insufficient evidence of intent. Further holding that certain jury instructions and selection of certain jurors did not constitute plain error, and that there was no per se ineffective assistance of counsel.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL :: Negligent homicide

STATE ex rel. NELSON, Prosecuting Attorney v. FRYE, No. 33499 (Per Curiam)(November 8, 2007). Denying a writ of prohibition sought to prevent dismissal of negligent homicide charges following a logging truck accident that resulted in the death of another driver. Holding that where the evidence showed that the truck driver was in excess of the recommended speed, but not over the speed limit, there was insufficient evidence of reckless disregard to sustain the charges.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Incest, sexual assault, double jeopardy

STATE v. JONATHON FREEMONT RAY, No. 33324 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring)(Albright, J., concurring)(November 8, 2007). Affirming sentences upon multiple convictions for sexual assault, incest and other sex-based offenses imposed by the Circuit Court of Preston County. Rejecting defendant's assertion that consanguinity is an element of the offense of incest, and holding that the statutory definition of incest is met where the victims were stepchildren of the defendant's biological brother. Further rejecting the assertion that double jeopardy prevents convictions for sexual assault and incest arising from the same incident. Applying the Blockburger test to determine that each offense requires a separate element to be proven.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Sufficient evidence to support sexual abuse by custodian

STATE v. KENNETH RAY COLLLINS, No. 33300 (Per Curiam). Affirming a conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Mingo County upon conviction for one count of sexual abuse in the third degree and one count of sexual abuse by a parent, guardian or custodian. Holding that the record ?- including evidence that the defendant "controlled and supervised the eleven year old girl on numerous, albeit temporary, occasions when he would take her away from home to go riding on his four-wheeler" -- reveals a sufficient basis for the jury to conclude that the defendant met the statutory definition of custodian.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Lesser-included misdemeanor, statute of limitations defense waived

STATE v. DANIEL B. BINGMAN, No. 33299 (Per Curiam)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Albright, J., dissenting)(October 26, 2007). Affirming a conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Gilmer County upon conviction for one count of petit larceny in violation of W. Va. Code 61-3-13(b). The indictment for grand larceny occurred more than one year after the offense. Holding that defense counsel failed to object to jury instructions on the lesser-included offense, thereby waiving any statute of limitations defense that could be asserted, in accord with rule announced in syllabus point 3 of STATE v. BOYD, 209 W. Va. 90, 543 S.E.2d 647 (2000).

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: Assessment of jury costs on defense counsel reversed

STATE EX REL. TERRON GODFREY v. ROWE, No. 33444 (Per Curiam)(Davis, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(October 16, 2007). Granting a moulded writ of prohibition to prevent enforcement of an order imposing jury costs on defense counsel following a mistrial. Holding that the trial court properly rejected defendant's assertion that the second trial was barred by double jeopardy. Further denying as premature relief sought in relation to a motion to join counts of a subsequent indictment and directing the circuit court to address the joinder motion.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL :: No prejudice in trial court amending indictment

STATE v. RICHARD ALLEN HAINES, No. 33304 (Per Curiam)(October 12, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Hampshire County that imposed sentence upon a jury conviction for one count of felony delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance. Rejecting appellant's contention that the trial court erred in amending the indictment, which had erroneously identified methamphetamine as a Schedule I controlled substance. Holding that the trial court properly concluded that the amendment was not substantial and did not require resubmission to the grand jury in light of the fact that the appellant was not misled, there was no additional burden of proof, and he was not prejudiced as a result of the amendment.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


CRIMINAL, HABEAS CORPUS, ATTORNEYS :: Ineffective assistance of counsel in mercy phase

STATE EX REL. SHANE SHELTON v. PAINTER, Warden, No. 33322 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(Benjamin, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(November 21, 2007). Granting mixed relief from an order of the Circuit Court of Ohio County that denied a post-conviction habeas corpus petition after conducting an evidentiary hearing. After testifying at trial and admitting that he shot the victim, Shelton was convicted of first degree murder without mercy. Reviewing the single issue of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, and holding that defense counsel betrayed his duty of loyalty to his client during closing argument by equivocating about whether his client deserved mercy, by failing to introduce any evidence in support of mercy, and by failing to make any meaningful plea for mercy, especially when combined with counsel's over-emphasis of his client's obvious guilt. Declining to remand for new trial on the issue of guilt, and requiring a limited new trial only on the penalty issue of whether Shelton should or should not receive mercy.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: Improper search

STATE v. KENNETH BOOKHEIMER and STATE v. JESSICA TINGLER, Nos. 33289 and 33290 (Per Curiam)(Starcher, J., concurring)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(Albright, J., concurring)(Benjamin, J., dissenting)(November 8, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Reversing orders of the Circuit Court of Braxton County that imposed sentences on convictions of conspiracy and operating a clandestine drug laboratory. Holding that the circuit court erred by allowing introduction of evidence seized as the result of an illegal search. Holding that agitated behavior by a resident upon the officer's arrival after receipt of a call regarding a domestic dispute did not create an emergency or exigent circumstance justifying warrantless entry into the mobile home. Neither party consented, officers were asked to leave, and there was no indication that a protective sweep was warranted or justified. Remanded for a new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, EVIDENCE :: 404(b) violations during cross-examination of defendant

STATE v. DAVID NELSON, No. 33188. (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(Starcher, J., concurring)(October 30, 2007). Reversing jury convictions of six felony offenses related to the death of Wanda Lesher, upon which the defendant had been sentenced to two terms of life without mercy, among other sentences to be served consecutively, on the basis that the defendant was denied a fair trial. Where defendant relied upon an alibi defense and testified at trial, it was error to permit the State on cross-examination to raise alleged acts of past misconduct that were unverified, inflammatory and not subjected to the requirements of Rule 404(b). The alleged acts were also not admissible in the context of rebuttal upon the issue of character.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JURY :: New trial awarded due to juror misconduct

STATE v. DANNY L. CECIL, No. 33298 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., dissenting)(November 21, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Putnam County imposing sentence upon jury convictions for multiple sex crimes. Rejecting several trial errors, including an assertion that the trial court improperly limited a defense expert with statistical evidence tending to undermine the veracity of assertions of sexual abuse victims. Reversing and remanding for a new trial in light of multiple instances of juror misconduct including investigation extrinsic to the deliberation process and one juror who contradicted the court's instructions on the weight to be given to testimony of witnesses. Remanded for new trial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

CRIMINAL, JURY :: Juror who worked with law enforcement properly seated

STATE v. WILLIAM MILLS, JR., No. 33340 (Per Curiam)(October 25, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that imposed sentence upon a jury conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. Rejecting appellant's contention that the trial court erred in refusing to strike a juror for cause. The juror was in uniform as a medic for county emergency services and also served on a volunteer fire department with a potential state witness. Concluding that the appellant failed to demonstrate a disqualifying social relationship, and further failed to specifically inquire as to the nature of the juror's relationships with law enforcement officials, and that the juror was very clear about being able to remain impartial.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?


HEALTH CARE :: Incest conviction precludes operating legally unlicensed health care home

PLUMLEY v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPT. of HEALTH and HUMAN RESOURCES/OFFICE of HEALTH FACILITY LICENSURE and CERTIFICATION, No. 33287 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Maynard, J., concurring)(Albright, J., dissenting)(October 12, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County that reversed an administrative order requiring closure of a "legally unlicensed health care home" as defined in West Virginia Code of State Rules 64-50-2.6. Holding that a conviction for felony incest, as revealed by a CIB background check, is sufficient to trigger a regulatory bar on operating such a health care home, because the conviction constitutes a crime relevant for the provision of care to a dependent population within the scope of W. Va. C.S.R. 64-50-4.4 (1999).

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

LOCAL GOVERNMENT, JAILS, PROCEDURE :: Regional jail fees

STATE EX REL. REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY v. COUNTY COMMISSION OF CABELL COUNTY, et al., No. 33347 (ALBRIGHT, J.)(Starcher, J., concurring)(November 21, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Granting a moulded writ of mandamus in a dispute over payments by a county commission to the regional jail authority to cover the daily cost of housing county inmates. Addressing the Court's authority to issue moulded writ relief in cases having statewide impact and affecting the public interest, and holding that the county commission is obligated to pay assessed per diem charges, but that the regional jail authority must promptly meet and formulate a proposed legislative rule as provided for by W. Va. Code 31-20-10(h), addressing issues of uniformity, calculation of the per diem rate, and further clarifying the documentation surrounding any future rate increases.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

MOTOR VEHICLES, CRIMINAL :: Post-Stump pleas of nolo contendere

STATE EX REL. BAKER v. BOLYARD, Dir. Div. Motor Vehicles, No. 33303 (BENJAMIN, J.)(Starcher, J., dissenting)(Maynard, J., concurring)(October 30, 2007). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County that affirmed an administrative decision imposing a six-month driver's license revocation on December 9, 2005, upon receipt of a notification for magistrate court that the defendant entered a nolo contendere plea to first offense DUI. The fact that the plea took place between the Court's prior decision in STATE EX REL STUMP v. JOHNSON, 217 W.Va. 733, 619 S.E.2d 246 (2005) and the May 15, 2006 amendment to W. Va. C.S.R. 91-5-14.1 means that the revocation was automatic upon notification of the nolo contendere plea.

??[Permanent Link] ?Google It!?

? The items on this page are archived by the day they are posted. Use the calendar to browse posts by day.
OPINION SEARCH
Full Text Opinions
Search 1991-Present COURT RULES
Links to Rules
Links to Forms CONFERENCE and ARGUMENT
Calendar
Live Webcast LINKS TO LAST 50 POSTS in this CATEGORY

View this page as XML [RSS 0.92]:
.

This page is based upon a modified version of the jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R theme for Radio Userland.

View the original article here